The Week in Iraq
The farewell kiss
by Lily Hamourtziadou

14 Dec 2008

The first shoe flew over the heads of other journalists and might have hit Bush square in the face had he not ducked to avoid it.

"This is a gift from the Iraqis. This is the farewell kiss, you dog," the man said at the press conference in Baghdad. He was Muntanther Zaidi, a correspondent for Baghdadiya, a satellite TV channel.

Seconds later, the journalist hurled his other shoe with similar precision as another Iraqi journalist reached over in an attempt to stop him.

"This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq," he said, according to the translation. (LA Times, 15 December)

Bush laughed it off. A normal reaction to being told you are responsible for thousands of deaths. The reaction of a man with principles. With a conscience.

This was on Sunday. On Thursday a major attack took place in Kirkuk, an attack that killed more than 50 civilians, the 9th such bombing this year.

Overall, it was one of the better weeks, for Iraq. About 95 civilians were killed or found dead, 8 children among them. A few more orphans were created, a few more widows were left alone to support their families, a few more victims added to the ‘cost of war’ list.

A laughing matter for Bush, perhaps, but it is no laughing matter for the Iraqis, or any half-decent person. It is only men like him, and like Tony Blair, who feel no shame, no remorse over the deaths they have caused. And it is precisely men like them who are in fact capable of such atrocities. Men without honour. Men without a sense of humanity. Men without mercy.

Blair made his exit last year, and Bush is about to make his own. What is the proper farewell to men like these? What can make them see and understand what it is they have done? What can make them give a damn?

The answer is probably ‘nothing’. Because only men like them –deaf and blind to the suffering of others- could have committed such acts.

(http://www.iraqbodycount.org/analysis/beyond/week-in-iraq/)

Thanks for posting this.

Also, in an interview after the shoe-throwing, he had the nerve to say (ever so eloquently): "I don't know what his beef is."

thanks for this, i was a bit curious. although the act seemed funny at the time, it had great meaning behind it.

The act itself did have great meaning behind it. I don't think this man should be jailed at all, and Im american, hell, Im from Texas where Bush is from. I think the man had great courage for what he did. I commend the man for standing up for the people who are suffering at the hands of the bush administration. I just wish he hadn't missed with the shoes.

If a man from the United States threw a shoe at Bush, then it would have great meaning behind it. I don't think it has anymore meaning there than it does here. Both are great signs of disrespect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe_tossing


No, it would not mean the same thing if an American threw the shoe at Bush, yes, it is disrespect, but this is a common way of showing it in their country, whereas for here, it isnt. That is what holds such significance at what this man done.

oops, wrong link, this one...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoeing

Yeah, even after reading the article, it's more or less the same thing - a sign of disrespect - the same thing it would mean here.