*Real* Anarchists. What do you think?

http://www.thenewanarchist.com/

I think they have been lied to.

The question was: How do you get the poor to fight for the rich man to keep them poor?
answer, use a trendy word like Anarchy, to promote free trade capitalism.

everything they say is a complete lie, as in the reality of what they wish for, isn't a reality at all
They will have a police force, they will enforce their laws, that collectively get voted on. even if one chooses not to participate they still have to obey the laws. the others vote on. They pretend like corporations cannot exist in the type of libertarians that it is, even though it was anarchist taht came up with libertarianism, i just say that to expose it in an example.

I battle with many of them on youtube.

Pointing out how what they belief and promote, is not really possible at all, and not exactly what they think it even is.

I think the idea of Anarchy is very idealistic- The 'Anarchist' state these people seek isnt really possible, due to human nature alone. However, I dont think that that necessarily makes it not worth fighting for. I *do* agree with what they say, and I *do* believe in their cause... I just dont believe that it's something human beings could ever possibly achieve.

OH TOTALLY - WHEN I WAS IN CANADA I MET SOME EARNEST, IDEALIST VEGETARIANS WHO WERE HARDCORE INTO THE POLITICS OF ANARCHY.

BUT THEN ALL POLITICAL PARTIES ARE IDEALISTIC TO SOME EXTENT, AND RENDERED IMPOSSIBLE DUE TO HUMAN NATURE. COMMUNISM IS WONDERFUL IN THEORY, BUT IN PRACTICE DOES NOT AND CANNOT WORK, BECAUSE OF HUMAN NATURE.

It's amusing that anarchists have a structured website, giving them information.

Doesn't that completely undermine any notions of anarchy!?

To a certain degree, but you have to imagine that they have to discuss their ideas somehow, otherwise they wouldnt know who agrees or disagrees. A website is as good as anything else I suppose

I want to know who -lead- the committee to design the website. -snicker-

lol... I know right!

Anarchy, ideally, is perfect. Then again, so is communism. On paper and in a flawless world, it works exceptionally well. But in reality, if we ever achieved anything close to anarchy, it would devolve into nothing more than survival of the fittest. A lot of people think of anarchy as meaning "I can do what the hell I want as long as I can beat the guy I'm doing it to." Essentially, it's the runty kids sixth grade gym class all over again....forever.

That, although unfortunate, I would have to agree with.